![]() He concludes that “Contemporary science shows the scientific God to be a coherent and plausible possibility.” and “To move on to acceptance of the religious God requires some personal experience that can be reasonably interpreted as access to the presence and power of the divine.” (p. Keith Ward’s main argument is that the religious and scientific Gods are not as far apart as we might think, “that belief in God is a rational option, which completes the scientific quest for understanding the universe and does not compete with it.” (p. His book consists of three parts: (1) the four major revolutions in worldview brought about by Galileo, Newton, Darwin and quantum theory, (2) the claim of some scientists that naturalistic science can explain everything and how God might provide a more satisfactory explanation, and (3) closing the gap between the god of the physicists and the personal, active, and miracle-working God of Christianity. ![]() Keith Ward wants “to convince friendly scientists that the scientific view of an ultimate cosmic intelligence is much more like the religious God than they many think.” (p. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |